Analytics of feedback from members of accreditation subcommittees - participants in the «Accred-ROSOMED» study
Tatiana Ripp,
Iurii Dukhovnyi,
Aleksandr Zverev,
Nina Nevskaya,
Yana Shikunova,
Elena Chabanets,
Sergey Khodus,
Zakhar Lopatin,
Viktoriia Shulga,
Evgeny Ripp https://doi.org/10.46594/2687-0037_2024_3_1841
Abstract
The feedback data obtained in the process of questioning members of accreditation subcommittees is one of the significant components of the consistent improvement of the accreditation process. The article provides a comparison of data from the pilot and multicenter stages of the Accred-ROSOMED prospective study, dedicated to the analytics of a survey of members of accreditation subcommittees regarding the most important issues of the accreditation process in the 2022 and 2023. These studies emphasize the importance of the mentioned issues, forming the basis for subsequent research continuation in order to provide the most complete and detailed representation of the accreditation process in the regions of Russian Federation and compare it with international experience.
About the Authors
Tatiana Ripp
ФГБУ "Национальный Медицинский Исследовательский Центр им. В.А.Алмазова" МЗ РФ
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Iurii Dukhovnyi
Aleksandr Zverev
Nina Nevskaya
Yana Shikunova
Elena Chabanets
Sergey Khodus
Zakhar Lopatin
Viktoriia Shulga
Evgeny Ripp
References
1. Приказ Министерства здравоохранения РФ от 28 октября 2022 г. № 709н «Об утверждении Положения об аккредитации специалистов» URL: https://www.garant.ru/products/ipo/prime/doc/405742919/ (дата обращения: 12.03.2024).
2. Рипп Т. М. и соавт. Члены аккредитационных комиссий — кто они? Портрет, запросы и ожидания. // Виртуальные технологии в медицине, 2023 (2) https://doi.org/10.46594/2687-0037_2023_2_1582 ].
3. Указ Президента РФ от 6 июня 2019 г. N 254 «О Стратегии развития здравоохранения в Российской Федерации на период до 2025 года» (с изменениями и дополнениями) URL: https://base.garant.ru/72264534/ (дата обращения: 12.03.2024).
4. Al-Hashimi K, Said UN, Khan TN. Formative Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCEs) as an Assessment Tool in UK Undergraduate Medical Education: A Review of Its Utility. Cureus. 2023 May 4;15(5):e38519. doi: 10.7759/cureus.38519. PMID: 37288230; PMCID: PMC10241740.
5. Ataro G. Methods, methodological challenges and lesson learned from phenomenological study about OSCE experience: Overview of paradigm-driven qualitative approach in medical education. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2019 Nov 23;49:19-23. DOI: 10.1016/j.amsu.2019.11.013
6. Kirwan C, Szafranska M, Coveney K, Horton S, Carroll L. Midwifery students' experiences of objective structured clinical examinations: A qualitative evidence synthesis. Nurse Educ Today. 2022 Jun;113:105381. doi: 10.1016/j.nedt.2022.105381. Epub 2022 Apr 21. PMID: 35489328.
7. Yusuf L. Objective Structured Clinical Examination? How students perceive their learning after OSCE. Pak J Med Sci. 2021 Jul-Aug;37(4):1206-1210. doi: 10.12669/pjms.37.4.4005. PMID: 34290809; PMCID: PMC8281189.
Review
For citations:
Ripp T., Dukhovnyi I., Zverev A., Nevskaya N., Shikunova Ya., Chabanets E., Khodus S., Lopatin Z., Shulga V., Ripp E. Analytics of feedback from members of accreditation subcommittees - participants in the «Accred-ROSOMED» study. Virtual Technologies in Medicine. 2024;(3):122-127. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46594/2687-0037_2024_3_1841
Views:
169
Email this article 