Preview

Virtual Technologies in Medicine

Advanced search

Obstetrics and gynecology: evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning format for students

https://doi.org/10.46594/2687-0037_2020_3_1122

Abstract

The aim of the study was to compare the effectiveness of traditional and distance educational technologies. Materials and methods. The effectiveness of the studied technologies was evaluated based on the analysis of the results of the final state certification. Results. The use of traditional and distance educational technologies in teaching students by obstetrics and gynecology is comparable. Conclusions. In the future, we should consider the possibility of transferring some sections of the educational process in medical educational institutions to a distance format.

About the Authors

V. A. Mudrov
Chita State Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Medical and Dental Faculties of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Chita State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of Russia, Chita, Russian Federation


M. N. Mochalova
Chita State Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor, Head of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Chita State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of Russia, Chita, Russian Federation


I. M. Ziganshin
Bashkir State Medical University
Russian Federation
Candidate of Medical Sciences, Associate Professor of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology with a course of IDPO, Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education "Bashkir State Medical University" of the Ministry of Health of Russia, Ufa, Russian Federation


A. Yu. Alekseeva
Chita State Medical Academy
Russian Federation
Assistant at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of the Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry of the Federal State Budgetary Educational Institution of Higher Education Chita State Medical Academy, Ministry of Health of Russia, Chita, Russian Federation


References

1. Marukhno VM. Distance education in medicine. Mezhdunarodnyy zhurnal eksperimental'nogo obrazovaniya [International Journal of Experimental Education]. 2012;4-2:154-156. (In Russ.)

2. Mochalova MN, Mudrov VA, Mironenko AYu. Olympiad movement as the method for the prevention of professional incompetence of future obstetrician-gynecologists. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern problems of science and education]. 2020;2:85-90. (In Russ.)

3. Mudrov VA. Algorithms for the statistical analysis of qualitative features in biomedical research using the SPSS software package. Zabaykal'skiy meditsinskiy vestnik [Transbaikal Medical Bulletin]. 2020;1:151-163. (In Russ.)

4. Mudrov VA. Algorithms for the statistical analysis of quantitative traits in biomedical research using the SPSS software package. Zabaykal'skiy meditsinskiy vestnik [Transbaikal Medical Bulletin]. 2020;1:140-150. (In Russ.)

5. Khvostunov KO, Lazareva OD. Distance learning in additional professional education of specialists: the experience of a medical university. Sovremennye problemy nauki i obrazovaniya [Modern problems of science and education]. 2017;5:264-269. (In Russ.)

6. Shatunovskiy VL, Shatunovskaya EA. Once again on distance learning (organization and provision of distance learning). Vestnik nauki i obrazovaniya [Bulletin of Science and Education]. 2020;9:53-56. (In Russ.)

7. Yashina LI. Distance Learning at the University: Content and Technologies. Vestnik Surgutskogo gosudarstvennogo pedagogicheskogo universiteta [Bulletin of Surgut State Pedagogical University]. 2019;1:142-147. (In Russ.)

8. International Committee of Medical Journal Editors. Uniform requirements for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals: writing and editing for biomedical publication, 2011. URL: https://www.icjme.org (Accessed June 26, 2020).

9. Jones O, Reid W. The development of a new speciality training programme in obstetrics and gynaecology in the UK. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;24(6):685-701. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.06.001

10. Jones O, Saunders H, Mires G. The E-learning revolution in obstetrics and gynaecology. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2010;24(6):731-746. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2010.04.009

11. Lang TA, Altman DG. Basic statistical reporting for articles published in Biomedical Journals: The “Statistical Analyses and Methods in the Published Literature” or the SAMPL Guidelines. International Journal of Nursing Studies. 2015;1:5-9. DOI: http://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2014.09.006

12. Sandars J. Technology and the delivery of the curriculum of the future: opportunities and challenges. Med Teach. 2012;34(7):534-538. DOI: http://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.671560


Supplementary files

1. Рисунок 1. Уровень формирования компетенций в исследуемых группах
Subject Акушерство, гинекология, студент, компетенции.
Type Результаты исследования
View (60KB)    
Indexing metadata ▾

Review

For citations:


Mudrov V.A., Mochalova M.N., Ziganshin I.M., Alekseeva A.Yu. Obstetrics and gynecology: evaluating the effectiveness of distance learning format for students. Virtual Technologies in Medicine. 2020;1(3):18-22. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46594/2687-0037_2020_3_1122

Views: 442


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2686-7958 (Print)
ISSN 2687-0037 (Online)