Highly realistic multidisciplinary training “in situ” — subjective assessment by the participants of the training
https://doi.org/10.46594/2687-0037_2022_2_1436
Abstract
An anonymous online survey was preformed following a highly realistic simulation training in situ organized for 45 physicians at City Mariinsky Hospital, St. Petersburg. The questionnaire contained 27 questions with global scale from 1 to 5 answer options. The analysis of the answers defined the psychological status of the participants during the training, identified the main stressors of the session and evaluated the subjective educational effect.
About the Authors
A. Andreenko
City Mariinsky Hospital, S.M. Kirov Military Medical Academy; City Mariinsky Hospital
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Alexander Andreenko.
St. Petersburg.
A. Zavrazhnov
City Mariinsky Hospital
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Anatoly Zavrazhnov.
St. Petersburg.
M. Gorshkov
Russian Society for Simulation Education in Medicine
Russian Federation
Russian Federation
Maxim Gorshkov.
Moscow.
References
1. Андреенко А. А. Высокореалистичная симуляция в анестезиологии и реаниматологии — теория и практика [Текст] / А. А. Андреенко. — Москва: Росомед, 2020. — 632 с.
2. Горшков М. Д. Симуляция in situ: преимущества, недостатки, меры предосторожности проведения медицинского симуляционного обучения на рабочем месте. [Текст] / М. Д. Горшков // Виртуальные технологии в медицине. — 2019. — № 2. — С. 61-62. — https://doi.org/10.46594/2687-0037_2019_2_61_2
3. Куприянов Р. В. Психодиагностика стресса [Текст]: практикум / Р. В. Куприянов, Ю. М. Кузьмина. — М-во образ. и науки РФ, Казан. гос. технол. ун-т. — Казань: КНИТУ, 2012. — 212 с.
4. Bardwick J. (1991). Danger in the Comfort Zone: From Boardroom to Mailroom — How to Break the Entitlement Habit that's Killing American Business. New York: Amacon, 1991.
5. Brasil G. C., Lima L. T. B., Cunha E. C., Cruz F. O. A. M., Ribeiro L. M. Stress level experienced by participants in realistic simulation: a systematic review. Rev Bras Enferm. 2021; 74(4):e20201151. https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2020-1151
6. Corvetto M. A., Taekman J. M. To die or not to die? A review of simulated death. Simul Healthc. 2013 Feb; 8(1):8-12.
7. Freund D., Andersen P. O., Svane C., Meyhoff C. S., S0rensen J. L. Unannounced vs announced in situ simulation of emergency teams: Feasibility and staff perception of stress and learning. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2019 May; 63(5):684-692. doi: 10.1111/aas.13321. Epub 2019 Jan 15. PMID: 30644087
8. Gaba D. M. Simulations that are challenging to the psyche of participants: how much should we worry and about what? Simul Healthc. 2013 Feb; 8(1):4-7. doi: 10.1097/SIH.0b013e3182845a6f. PMID: 23380693
9. Goldshtein, Daniel & Krensky, Cole & Doshi, Sachin & Perelman, Vsevolod. (2019) In situ simulation and its effects on patient outcomes: a systematic review Systematic review. BMJ Simulation and Technology Enhanced Learning. 6. 1-7. doi: 10.1136/bmjstel-2018-000387
10. Gunhild Kjaergaard-Andersen, Pernille Ibsgaard, Charlotte Paltved, Hanne Irene Jensen, an in situ simulation program: a quantitative and qualitative prospective study identifying latent safety threats and examining participant experiences, International Journal for Quality in Health Care, Vol. 33, Is. 1, 2021, mzaa148, https://doi.org/10.1093/intqhc/mzaa148
11. Kurup V., Matei V., Ray J. Role of in-situ simulation for training in healthcare: opportunities and challenges. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2017 Dec; 30(6):755-760. doi: 10.1097/ACO.0000000000000514. PMID: 28968283
12. Martin A., Cross S., Attoe C. The Use of in situ Simulation in Healthcare Education: Current Perspectives. Adv Med Educ Pract. 2020; 11:893-903 https://doi.org/10.2147/AMEP.S188258
13. Muse L. A., S. G. Harris, and H. S. Field. (2003). Has the Inverted-U Theory of Stress and Job Performance Had a Fair Test? Human Performance 16 (4): 349-364.
14. Gaba, David. Simulations that are challenging to the psyche of participants: how much should we worry and about what? Simul. Healthc. 2013 Feb;8(1):4-7
15. S0rensen J. L., 0stergaard D., LeBlanc V., et al. Design of simulationbased medical education and advantages and disadvantages of in situ simulation versus off-site simulation. BMC Med Educ. 2017; 17(1):20. doi:10.1186/s12909-016-0838-3
16. Spurr J., Gatward J., Joshi N., Carley S. D. Top 10 (+1) tips to get started with in situ simulation in emergency and critical care departments. Emerg Med J. 2016 Jul; 33(7):514-6. doi: 10.1136/emermed-2015-204845. Epub 2016 Mar 11. PMID: 26969169
Review
For citations:
Andreenko A., Zavrazhnov A., Gorshkov M. Highly realistic multidisciplinary training “in situ” — subjective assessment by the participants of the training. Virtual Technologies in Medicine. 2022;(2):76-85. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.46594/2687-0037_2022_2_1436
Views:
269
Email this article 